Blog
Business
Building the Future of Finance: ONINO's Vision and What Comes Next
How regulated digital securities infrastructure is reshaping European capital markets, with ONINO's vision and near-term trajectory.

Kristina Stark
Junior Growth Manager

Building the Future of Finance: ONINO's Vision and What Comes Next
The future of finance is not a speculative concept. It is an infrastructure transition already underway in regulated European markets. Capital raising, which has for decades relied on paper-based processes, intermediary-heavy distribution, and opaque secondary markets, is being restructured around programmable digital securities and compliant financing platforms. ONINO operates at the center of this structural shift, having processed over EUR 35 million in tokenized capital through 8 live platforms as of 2025, with a Volksbank partnership as proof of institutional validation.
This article examines where the financing infrastructure is heading, what ONINO's role is in that trajectory, and what specific changes companies, fund operators, and financing advisors can expect in the near and medium term.
What "Future of Finance" Actually Means in Practice
The phrase "future of finance" is frequently deployed in investor reports from BCG, KPMG, and Deloitte, and it tends to carry different meanings depending on the audience. For retail banking, it refers to embedded finance and AI-driven credit scoring. For capital markets, it refers to the digitalization of securities issuance, distribution, and custody. For private markets, it refers specifically to the elimination of structural barriers that have historically made private capital inaccessible to most investors.
At its core, the structural shift in finance is about three things: who can access capital, how quickly it can be structured, and how transparently it can be tracked. Traditional debt and equity instruments carry significant friction. A mid-sized company seeking to raise EUR 5 million from private investors in Europe historically faced a 6-to-12 month process involving investment banks, legal structuring, prospectus preparation, and manual investor onboarding. The minimum viable deal size was dictated not by market demand but by operational costs.
Digital securities infrastructure changes this cost function. When a financing product is structured as a programmable instrument on a distributed ledger, the operational overhead of issuance, distribution, KYC, custody, and reporting drops significantly. The result is that deal structures which were previously uneconomical at EUR 500,000 or EUR 1 million become viable. This is not a theoretical outcome. It is what ONINO's 8 active platforms demonstrate at a live operational level.
The Infrastructure Layers Being Rebuilt
To understand where finance is heading, it helps to map which specific infrastructure layers are being reconstructed and in what order. Finance as a system has several discrete operational layers, each of which carries its own complexity, regulation, and legacy technology.
Infrastructure Layer | Traditional State | Digital Securities State | Transition Status |
|---|---|---|---|
Issuance | Manual, legal-intensive, 3-6 months | Structured via platform templates, days to weeks | Active transition in EU |
Investor Onboarding | Paper KYC, sequential review | Digital KYC with automated compliance checks | Widely deployed |
Distribution | Broker-dealer networks, high minimums | Direct digital distribution, lower minimums | Partially deployed |
Custody | Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) | Digital custody via regulated providers | Regulatory framework evolving |
Secondary Market | Stock exchanges, high liquidity threshold | Regulated digital trading venues | Early stage in EU |
Reporting | Manual, periodic, prone to error | Automated, near-real-time, programmable | Active development |
The transition is not uniform across these layers. Issuance and investor onboarding have moved furthest along. Secondary market liquidity remains the most underdeveloped, both technically and from a regulatory standpoint. ONINO's platform addresses the primary capital raise layers directly, allowing issuers to go from structuring to live capital raise within 24 hours.
ONINO's Position in the Emerging Financing Ecosystem
ONINO is not a generalist blockchain company. It operates specifically as regulated financing infrastructure in the European market, serving financing consultants, fund operators, banks, and SMEs that want to raise capital from investors in a compliant structure. This distinction matters because the "future of finance" narrative is frequently dominated by crypto-adjacent technology companies whose primary products are not compliant with EU financial regulation.
ONINO's positioning reflects four operational realities that differentiate it from early-stage tokenization platforms:
8 live platforms actively conducting investor fundraising, not pilots or proofs-of-concept
EUR 35 million tokenized capital across active issuances, providing operational data on real-world performance
Volksbank partnership, indicating institutional acceptance of digital securities infrastructure at the banking level
Sub-24-hour platform setup time, reducing the technical barrier for new issuers to near zero
The Volksbank partnership is particularly significant as a signal. Germany's cooperative banking sector is structurally conservative and risk-aware. When a Volksbank validates a digital securities platform as operational infrastructure rather than experimental technology, it indicates that the institutional finance world has moved past the evaluation stage and into deployment.
ONINO's role in the ecosystem is as the infrastructure layer, not as an investment advisor, broker-dealer, or fund manager. Its clients are the entities that build on top of it: white-label financing platforms, specialized capital raise operations, and institutional distribution networks. This infrastructure-layer positioning means ONINO's growth is multiplied through the platforms built on it rather than through direct deal flow.
European Regulatory Architecture and Its Role in the Transition
The European Union's approach to digital securities regulation is more structured and further advanced than comparable frameworks in North America or Asia. This regulatory clarity is one of the primary reasons that the EU is becoming the leading jurisdiction for compliant digital securities issuance.
Three regulatory instruments are central to understanding the trajectory:
MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation): MiCA, which entered into force in 2023 and applies fully from the end of 2024, establishes a comprehensive framework for crypto-assets in the EU. Critically, MiCA explicitly carves out traditional financial instruments that happen to be represented on blockchain infrastructure. These instruments remain under existing securities law (MiFID II, the Prospectus Regulation), which means they benefit from established investor protection frameworks rather than operating in a regulatory gray area.
The EU Pilot Regime for DLT Market Infrastructures: This regulation, which came into force in 2023, allows regulated market operators to run experimental DLT-based trading and settlement systems without full compliance with all existing MiFID II requirements. The Pilot Regime is significant because it creates a legal pathway for regulated secondary market infrastructure for digital securities to develop, which addresses the liquidity gap identified earlier.
The European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF 2.0): Updated ELTIF rules that took effect in 2024 significantly broadened the eligible investor base for long-term private market funds and reduced minimum investment thresholds. This regulatory change directly increases the addressable investor base for digital securities issuances targeting private market capital.
Taken together, these three regulatory developments are not coincidental. They represent a coordinated EU policy direction toward digitalized capital markets that are still governed by investor protection principles. ONINO's infrastructure is built within this framework, not outside it, which is why institutional actors like Volksbank are able to partner with it.
What Changes for Capital Raisers Over the Next Five Years
For companies, fund operators, and financing advisors who are currently operating in traditional capital raise environments, the near-term future involves several structural changes that are already in motion.
The first change is the compression of deal timelines. A traditional private placement currently involves weeks of legal structuring, prospectus review, and distribution preparation. Digital securities infrastructure compresses this to days. The legal documents are still required, but the operational overhead of investor onboarding, payment processing, and securities issuance is handled programmatically. For issuers, this means deal economics improve because fewer resources are consumed per EUR raised.
The second change is a reduction in minimum viable deal size. Traditional investment banking economics require large deal sizes to justify the overhead. Digital financing platforms allow issuers to raise smaller amounts without proportionally higher costs. This opens capital raise as a tool to SMEs and mid-market companies that were previously below the threshold for institutional intermediaries.
The third change is investor base expansion. Digital securities platforms with compliant KYC and AML processes can distribute to a broader investor base than traditional private placements, which are typically restricted to institutional and high-net-worth investors. Regulatory changes like ELTIF 2.0 and national small-investor exemptions in Germany and Austria further expand who can invest.
The fourth change, which is further out but already developing, is secondary market liquidity. Currently, most digital securities are illiquid after issuance, which limits their appeal to investors who require exit optionality. The EU Pilot Regime is creating the regulatory infrastructure for compliant secondary trading venues. When these mature, the asset class becomes significantly more attractive to a broader investor population.
Change | Current State (2025) | Near-Term State (2027-2028) | Impact on Issuers |
|---|---|---|---|
Deal Timeline | Weeks to months | Days | Lower per-deal cost |
Minimum Deal Size | EUR 1M+ for institutional; smaller with crowdfunding | EUR 250K-500K viable | Opens market to SMEs |
Investor Base | Qualified investors, HNW | Broader retail via ELTIF 2.0 and national exemptions | Larger investor pools |
Secondary Liquidity | Minimal; mostly illiquid | Pilot Regime venues operational | Improved investor appeal |
Reporting Burden | Manual, periodic | Automated, near-real-time | Reduced compliance overhead |
ONINO's Development Trajectory
ONINO's own roadmap reflects the infrastructure investment horizon of the industry. Rather than pivoting toward new asset classes or expanding geographically before the core infrastructure is proven, ONINO's current focus is on deepening the platform capabilities that its existing clients use and demonstrating repeatable performance metrics that institutional partners can evaluate.
The platform's sub-24-hour setup time is not primarily a marketing claim. It is a constraint on go-to-market strategy. Financing consultants and fund operators who evaluate white-label platforms need to be able to test, configure, and launch within a business cycle, not a procurement cycle. ONINO's setup speed removes the technical integration bottleneck that has historically prevented smaller financing specialists from deploying digital securities infrastructure.
Looking ahead, ONINO is positioned at the intersection of three converging trends: regulatory maturation of EU digital securities law, institutional adoption of digital financing infrastructure, and compression of capital raise timelines. Each of these trends independently increases the addressable market for compliant digital securities platforms. Together, they create conditions where the financing infrastructure ONINO provides shifts from a specialized capability to standard market practice.
The Volksbank partnership illustrates this trajectory. When ONINO first began operations, the primary clients were specialized financing consultants and fintech-native operators who were comfortable with digital tools. The involvement of Volksbank in the ecosystem signals that the technology has crossed into mainstream institutional adoption. This is consistent with the typical S-curve of financial infrastructure adoption: early adopters from fintech, followed by regional banks and specialists, followed by mainstream institutional deployment.
Practical Implications for Financing Advisors and Fund Operators
For financing advisors and fund operators evaluating whether digital securities infrastructure is relevant to their business in the near term, the relevant question is not whether the transition is happening but how quickly their client base will demand it.
Advisors working with mid-market companies in DACH region markets are likely to encounter the first wave of client demand within the next 12 to 24 months. Companies that have previously raised capital through traditional bond or equity structures are beginning to ask about digital alternatives, primarily because of the cost reduction and timeline compression they offer.
Fund operators focused on real estate, private equity, or infrastructure assets face a slightly different calculation. For these operators, the primary value proposition of digital securities is not just cost reduction but investor base expansion. A fund that could previously only target qualified investors can, under appropriate regulatory conditions, reach a broader investor population. This changes the fund economics at a structural level.
The practical steps for advisors and operators who want to evaluate digital securities infrastructure are straightforward:
Identify whether the target asset class is compatible with digital securities issuance under applicable EU regulation (the answer is yes for most debt, equity, and fund structures)
Map the target investor base and confirm which regulatory exemptions or prospectus thresholds apply
Evaluate platform providers on the basis of regulatory compliance status, not technology novelty
Pilot a small issuance to build internal competence before committing to full deployment
The barrier to starting a pilot is lower than most financing advisors expect. ONINO's platform can be operational within 24 hours, and the underlying regulatory framework for a small private placement is well-established in Germany, Austria, and across the EU. The first deal is always the most complex because it requires internal process changes, not because the technology is difficult.
Ready to launch?
ONINO's infrastructure handles compliance, investor onboarding, and reporting from day one -- so you can focus on structuring your deal and building your investor base. Platforms go live in under 24 hours, with no internal technical build required.
FAQ
What is the next big thing in finance?
From a capital markets perspective, the most significant near-term development is the maturation of digital securities infrastructure in regulated jurisdictions. This includes the operationalization of EU Pilot Regime secondary trading venues, the broader rollout of ELTIF 2.0 compatible structures, and the adoption of digital securities issuance by mainstream banking institutions. These are not speculative developments. They are active regulatory and operational processes currently underway in European markets.
What will be the future of the finance industry?
The finance industry is moving toward a state where the operational infrastructure of capital markets, including issuance, distribution, custody, and settlement, is programmable rather than manual. This does not mean that financial regulation disappears or that professional intermediaries become obsolete. It means that the cost function of financial operations changes, making markets accessible to a broader range of issuers and investors. The timeline for this transition varies by market segment, with private markets further along than public securities markets.
How does digital securities infrastructure differ from traditional banking?
Traditional banking infrastructure relies on centralized intermediaries, sequential processes, and significant manual oversight. Digital securities infrastructure uses programmable instruments on distributed ledger systems to automate the operational components of financial transactions while maintaining compliance with existing securities regulation. The legal framework governing the underlying securities does not change. What changes is the operational layer: how securities are issued, distributed, tracked, and reported. ONINO operates this operational layer for its platform clients.
Is digital securities issuance regulated in Europe?
Yes. Digital securities issued in the EU are governed by existing securities regulation, including MiFID II and the EU Prospectus Regulation, depending on the structure and investor base of the issuance. MiCA explicitly excludes instruments that qualify as financial instruments under MiFID II from its scope. The EU has also introduced the DLT Pilot Regime to facilitate compliant digital market infrastructure. ONINO operates within this regulatory framework and supports issuers in structuring compliant offerings.
What types of companies can raise capital using digital securities?
Any company that is eligible to issue debt or equity instruments under applicable EU regulation can structure those instruments as digital securities. In practice, the most active use cases are mid-market SMEs raising subordinated debt or profit participation instruments, real estate fund operators issuing digital fund units, and infrastructure project companies raising project finance. The common thread is that these are private market capital raises that benefit from the cost efficiency and investor reach that digital infrastructure provides.
How long does it take to set up a digital securities platform with ONINO?
ONINO's platform can be configured and operational within 24 hours for a standard white-label setup. The technical setup time is not the primary constraint for most issuers. The relevant timeline factors are legal structuring of the instrument, preparation of required documentation under applicable prospectus or disclosure rules, and KYC/AML onboarding processes for the target investor base. For a standard private placement, the total timeline from platform setup to first investor onboarding is typically measured in days, not months.
Summary
The future of finance in European capital markets is defined by the digitalization of financing infrastructure, not by cryptocurrency adoption. Regulated digital securities platforms are the operative mechanism of this transition.
ONINO's operational metrics, including EUR 35 million tokenized, 8 live platforms, and the Volksbank partnership, reflect a market that has moved from experimental to institutional deployment.
EU regulatory developments, including MiCA, the DLT Pilot Regime, and ELTIF 2.0, collectively provide a maturing legal framework for digital securities that reduces regulatory uncertainty for issuers and investors.
For financing advisors and fund operators, the practical implication is a compression of deal timelines, expansion of viable deal sizes, and a broader addressable investor base within the next 2 to 3 years.
Secondary market liquidity for digital securities remains the most underdeveloped component of the infrastructure stack and represents the primary structural constraint on broader adoption in private markets.

Kristina Stark
Junior Growth Manager
Share
Read related Articles
How regulated digital securities infrastructure is reshaping European capital markets, with ONINO's vision and near-term trajectory.


