Blog
Business
How Digital Securities Create Value for Issuers and Investors
How digital securities reduce costs for issuers while opening new asset classes for investors. EU regulatory context, real-world data & the value chain explained.

Alexandre Lehr
CEO

How Digital Securities Create Value for Issuers and Investors
Digital securities create value by reducing the operational cost and time required to raise capital and by opening asset classes to investors who previously had no access to them. This is not a technology claim. It is an economic one. When the mechanics of issuing, distributing, and managing a financial instrument become programmable rather than manual, the cost structure of capital markets changes in ways that benefit both the companies raising money and the people investing it.
This article explains how that value works in practice, who captures it, and what the current state of digital securities markets in Europe looks like.
What Digital Securities Are and What They Are Not
A digital security is a financial instrument — a bond, equity share, fund unit, or profit participation right — that is issued, recorded, and managed using digital infrastructure, typically on a distributed ledger system. The instrument itself is governed by the same securities law that governs traditional financial instruments. What changes is the operational layer: how the instrument is created, how investors subscribe, how ownership is recorded, and how returns are distributed.
This distinction matters because digital securities are frequently confused with cryptocurrencies. They are not the same thing. A cryptocurrency like Bitcoin is a bearer instrument with no issuer, no underlying asset, and no regulatory framework governing investor protection. A digital security is the opposite: it has a defined issuer, underlying economic rights, and is subject to EU securities regulation including MiFID II and the Prospectus Regulation depending on structure and deal size.
The EU regulatory framework explicitly recognizes this distinction. MiCA, the EU's comprehensive crypto-asset regulation, explicitly excludes financial instruments that qualify under MiFID II from its scope. Digital securities fall under established investor protection frameworks, not the newer crypto-asset rules. This regulatory clarity is one of the reasons the EU has become the most active jurisdiction for compliant digital securities issuance.
Feature | Cryptocurrency | Digital Security |
|---|---|---|
Issuer | None (decentralized) | Defined legal entity |
Underlying rights | None | Economic rights (interest, dividends, profit share) |
Regulatory framework | MiCA (EU) | MiFID II, Prospectus Regulation |
Investor protection | Limited | Full EU securities law protections |
Purpose | Exchange medium or store of value | Capital raising instrument |
Examples | Bitcoin, Ether | Digital bonds, fund units, profit participation rights |
Understanding this table is the foundation for understanding where digital securities create value. They are not a new asset class in the way cryptocurrencies are. They are an existing asset class delivered through more efficient infrastructure.
Value Created for Issuers: Cost, Speed, and Investor Reach
For a company or fund raising capital, digital securities create value through three distinct mechanisms: lower issuance cost, faster time to market, and access to a broader investor base.
Lower issuance cost comes from automating the operational components that drive cost in traditional capital raises. In a traditional private placement, the process of investor onboarding, subscription collection, securities issuance, and registry management requires a combination of investment bank, transfer agent, and legal coordination that generates significant fees regardless of deal size. When these components are handled by a digital platform, the fixed cost per issuance drops. The legal structuring of the instrument remains a cost — that does not change — but the operational overhead shrinks materially.
Faster time to market is the most immediately visible benefit. A company using ONINO's financing infrastructure can have a configured, investor-ready platform operational within 24 hours. The legal preparation still takes weeks, but the platform component that used to add months to a deal timeline is effectively removed. For issuers with deal timelines driven by market conditions or investor availability, this compression has direct economic value.
Broader investor reach is the most structurally significant benefit over the medium term. Traditional private placements are typically restricted to institutional and high-net-worth investors because the cost of onboarding smaller investors individually makes small subscriptions uneconomical. Digital platforms with automated KYC and AML processes can onboard a larger number of investors at lower per-investor cost, making smaller subscription sizes viable. The EU's crowdfunding regulation (ECSPR) and national small-investor exemptions in Germany and Austria provide the regulatory framework for this broader distribution.
Issuance Component | Traditional Process | Digital Securities Platform | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Investor onboarding | Manual KYC, 2-5 days per investor | Automated digital KYC, minutes per investor | 99% time reduction |
Subscription processing | Manual forms, bank transfers, reconciliation | Digital subscription with automated payment | Days to minutes |
Securities registry | Transfer agent, manual updates | Distributed ledger, automatic updates | Real-time vs. periodic |
Investor reporting | Manual document preparation | Automated generation from platform data | Ongoing vs. periodic |
Platform setup | Investment bank mandate, months | White-label platform, 24 hours | Months to hours |
ONINO's operational data provides concrete evidence of these benefits at scale. With EUR 35 million in tokenized capital across 8 live platforms, including a Volksbank partnership, the platform has demonstrated that the cost and timeline benefits are not theoretical. They are live operational results across a range of SME and mid-market deal structures.
Value Created for Investors: Access, Transparency, and Return Structure
For investors, digital securities create value in ways that are distinct from the issuer benefits. The three primary mechanisms are access to previously unavailable asset classes, greater transparency into the instruments they hold, and more flexible return structures.
Access to new asset classes is the most direct investor benefit. Private market instruments — real estate debt, infrastructure project finance, SME subordinated loans — have historically been accessible only to institutional investors or high-net-worth individuals with minimum investment thresholds of EUR 100,000 or more. Digital securities platforms can lower these minimums significantly. An investor who could previously only access listed bonds or bank deposits can now invest in a diversified private market instrument starting at EUR 500 or EUR 1,000 on a compliant platform.
This access expansion is not unlimited. The specific investor eligibility depends on the regulatory pathway used for the issuance. A qualified investor private placement under the EU Prospectus Regulation is restricted to professional investors. An ECSPR crowdfunding issuance can reach retail investors but caps maximum investment per investor based on the investor's financial circumstances. National small-investor exemptions allow broader retail access for specific instrument types. Understanding which regulatory pathway an issuance uses determines who can actually invest in it.
Greater transparency comes from the programmable nature of digital securities. When the terms of a financial instrument are encoded in smart contract logic, the conditions for interest payments, redemption, and investor rights are verifiable by any party with access to the ledger. This reduces the information asymmetry between issuers and investors that characterizes many private market instruments. It does not eliminate counterparty risk — the issuer can still default — but it reduces the ambiguity about what the instrument terms actually are.
More flexible return structures are possible because digital instruments can automate distributions based on programmable conditions. An instrument that pays monthly interest above a certain revenue threshold, for example, can execute those payments automatically without requiring manual calculation and transfer initiation from the issuer. This reduces operational risk from the investor's perspective: the terms execute as programmed rather than depending on administrative processes that can fail or be delayed.
The EU Regulatory Architecture That Enables Value Creation
Value creation in digital securities depends on regulatory clarity. An investor who cannot be certain that their instrument is legally enforceable, that their ownership is properly recorded, or that the issuer is operating within a regulated framework will not invest. An issuer who cannot obtain legal certainty about which rules apply to their issuance cannot structure the instrument. Regulatory clarity is the precondition for the value creation mechanisms described above.
The EU has built this regulatory architecture across three instruments that are relevant for digital securities in the current market:
MiFID II governs the issuance and distribution of financial instruments in the EU. Digital securities that qualify as financial instruments under MiFID II are subject to the full investor protection framework of EU securities law, including rules on disclosure, suitability assessment, and complaint handling. This framework is what distinguishes digital securities from unregulated crypto-assets and is what makes institutional investors willing to participate.
The EU Prospectus Regulation determines when a formal prospectus is required for a securities offering. For public offers above EUR 8 million, a full prospectus approved by BaFin or an equivalent national regulator is required. Below this threshold, national exemptions apply. For private placements to qualified investors, no prospectus is required regardless of size. This tiered framework allows issuers to choose the appropriate regulatory pathway based on their deal size and target investor base.
The DLT Pilot Regime, which came into force in 2023, allows regulated market operators to run experimental DLT-based trading and settlement systems. This is significant for investors because it creates the regulatory pathway for compliant secondary markets in digital securities to develop. Secondary market liquidity — the ability to sell a digital security before maturity — is currently limited, but the Pilot Regime is the mechanism through which this will change over the next several years.
Where Value Has Already Been Created: Market Evidence
The digital securities market in Europe is past the pilot stage. Concrete market data and operational evidence demonstrate that value creation is occurring at measurable scale.
ONINO's own metrics illustrate this at the platform level: EUR 35 million in tokenized capital across 8 live platforms, with institutional validation through a Volksbank partnership. The sub-24-hour platform setup time has been operationally demonstrated across multiple issuances, confirming that the timeline compression benefits described earlier are real and repeatable.
At the broader market level, the trends support the value creation thesis. The EU crowdfunding market has grown significantly since ECSPR harmonization in 2023, with more platforms obtaining cross-border licenses and more issuers using the framework for SME capital raises. Germany's VermAnlG framework has facilitated hundreds of digital securities issuances in the EUR 500,000 to EUR 6 million range, demonstrating market demand at the SME scale.
The asset classes being digitized tell a clear story about where investor demand exists. Real estate debt instruments and profit participation certificates represent the majority of German digital securities issuances, reflecting investor appetite for private market yields in a rate environment that has made traditional fixed income less attractive. Infrastructure project finance and renewable energy project bonds represent a growing segment, driven by both investor interest and issuer demand for long-term patient capital.
Asset Class | Typical Instrument | Investor Appeal | Issuer Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|
Real estate | Subordinated loan, profit participation | Private market yield, asset backing | Lower cost than bank construction finance |
SME working capital | Subordinated bond, profit participation | Higher yield than deposits | Flexible structure, no collateral |
Infrastructure / energy | Project bond, fund unit | Long-term yield, impact element | Access to long-term investors |
Private equity / fund | Fund unit, carried interest | Private market returns | Broader investor base than traditional fund placement |
Receivables / trade finance | ABS-style instrument | Short duration, predictable return | Working capital optimization |
Where Value Creation Is Still Developing
An accurate analysis of digital securities value creation requires acknowledging where the mechanisms are not yet fully functional. Three areas remain underdeveloped relative to the potential described above.
Secondary market liquidity is the most significant constraint. Most digital securities issued today are held to maturity because there is no liquid secondary market for them. The EU Pilot Regime creates the regulatory framework for this to change, but the development of operating secondary market venues takes time. Until secondary liquidity exists at meaningful scale, the investor base for digital securities remains limited to those who can commit capital for the full instrument duration. This is a material constraint on how much investor demand can be mobilized.
Retail investor access remains narrower than the potential of the infrastructure would suggest. While the technical capability to onboard retail investors exists, the regulatory pathways that allow broad retail distribution impose limitations on investment amounts, require investor financial assessments, and vary by member state. An investor in Germany has access to different instruments under different conditions than an investor in France or the Netherlands. Full retail democratization of private market access requires further regulatory harmonization at the EU level.
Standardization of instrument terms and documentation is still evolving. Unlike listed bonds or equity, where market conventions are well established, digital securities issuances use a wider variety of structural approaches. This makes it harder for investors to compare instruments across issuers and creates additional due diligence overhead. As the market matures, conventions are developing but have not yet reached the standardization level of traditional capital market instruments.
Ready to launch?
ONINO's infrastructure handles compliance, investor onboarding, and reporting from day one -- so you can focus on structuring your deal and building your investor base. Platforms go live in under 24 hours, with no internal technical build required.
FAQ
What benefits does tokenization offer to investors?
Digital securities offer investors access to private market asset classes that were previously available only to institutional or high-net-worth investors, with lower minimum investment thresholds. They also provide greater transparency through programmable instrument terms and the potential for automated, condition-based distributions. The primary limitation currently is secondary market liquidity: most digital securities are held to maturity because compliant secondary trading venues are not yet operational at scale.
What is the main purpose of tokenization in finance?
The primary purpose of digital securities issuance in finance is to reduce the operational cost and complexity of capital raising for issuers while expanding investor access to private market instruments. The technology enables the automation of processes that were previously manual and intermediary-dependent, including investor onboarding, subscription processing, securities registry management, and investor reporting. The result is a lower cost per EUR raised for issuers and a lower minimum investment threshold for investors.
Who will benefit the most from digital securities?
In the near term, the greatest beneficiaries are SMEs and mid-market companies that were previously too small for institutional capital markets but too large for bank lending alone. Digital financing platforms make deal sizes of EUR 500,000 to EUR 10 million economically viable, which addresses a structural gap in European SME financing. For investors, the greatest near-term benefit is access to private market yield instruments that were previously inaccessible below institutional minimums.
What is issuer tokenization?
Issuer tokenization refers to the process by which a company or fund structures and issues a financial instrument as a digital security. The issuer creates the instrument terms, obtains any required regulatory approvals or notifications, and deploys the issuance through a compliant digital financing platform. Investors subscribe digitally, payments are processed automatically, and ownership is recorded on the platform's registry. The issuer retains full control of the underlying business or asset — tokenization is a capital raising mechanism, not a transfer of operational control.
How large is the digital securities market in Europe?
The European digital securities market is in an early but growing stage. Germany has been the most active market, with hundreds of digital securities issuances under VermAnlG and growing adoption of the ECSPR crowdfunding framework following its 2023 harmonization. Precise market size data varies by definition and source, but operational platforms like ONINO provide concrete benchmarks: EUR 35 million in completed tokenized capital raises across 8 live platforms as of 2025. The broader addressable market for SME and private market capital raises in Europe runs into hundreds of billions of euros annually, of which digital securities currently represent a small but rapidly growing share.
How does ONINO create value through its digital securities platform?
ONINO creates value by providing the operational and compliance infrastructure for digital securities issuances that financing specialists and fund operators use to serve issuers. The platform covers KYC/AML investor onboarding, subscription processing, securities issuance mechanics, and investor reporting. For issuers, this translates to faster deal execution, lower operational overhead, and access to broader investor distribution than traditional intermediary-based processes. For investors, it provides access to compliant private market instruments with automated subscription and reporting processes.
Summary
Digital securities are traditional financial instruments — bonds, fund units, profit participation rights — delivered through digital infrastructure, governed by EU securities law, and distinct from cryptocurrencies in both legal status and investor protection framework.
For issuers, the primary value mechanisms are lower operational cost per issuance, faster time to market through automated KYC and subscription processing, and access to broader investor distribution including retail investors under applicable EU exemptions.
For investors, the primary value mechanisms are access to private market asset classes previously available only at institutional minimums, greater transparency through programmable instrument terms, and the potential for automated condition-based distributions.
The EU regulatory architecture (MiFID II, Prospectus Regulation, DLT Pilot Regime) provides the legal foundation that makes this value creation trustworthy and enforceable, distinguishing digital securities from unregulated alternatives.
Secondary market liquidity, retail investor access harmonization, and instrument standardization remain underdeveloped relative to the long-term potential, and represent the primary areas where value creation will expand as the market matures.

Alexandre Lehr
CEO
Share
Read related Articles
How digital securities reduce costs for issuers while opening new asset classes for investors. EU regulatory context, real-world data & the value chain explained.



